Because you are disabled.

File for disability benefits.

Appeal your case.

How you presented your initial application was the best you could do at that time given what you knew and were told.

But, if you were not successful, appeal (1) because you are disabled and (2) because you can improve on your presentation.

Saturday, March 1, 2014

Lumbar spine degenerative discogenic disease, lumbar radiculopathy, a left medial meniscus tear, median nerve entrapment in both wrists and major depressive disorders.




On appeal the claimant argued that the Administrative Law Judge’s hypothetical presented to the vocational expert did not accurately reflect all of claimant’s functional limitations.  Specifically, the claimant suggested that the ALJ wrongly concluded that, “unskilled work inherently involves low levels of stress for employees.”

The court stated:  “While a correlation between unskilled and low-stress positions may indeed exist, it does not follow that unskilled work is necessarily low-stress. When a claimant’s mental impairments are at issue, there is a need to examine the individual’s specific vocational abilities in light of the impairment.” 

Citing case law, the court quoted Social Security Ruling 85-15:

“The basic mental demands of competitive, remunerative, unskilled work include the abilities (on a sustained basis) to understand, carry out, and remember simple instructions; to respond appropriately to supervision, coworkers, and usual work situations; and to deal with changes in a routine work setting.”

The court found that: “The ALJ erred in making an independent assumption that unskilled work is inherently low-stress, rather than incorporating the factors necessary to properly evaluate the impact of a mental impairment on claimant’s vocational abilities into his hypothetical to the [vocational expert]. . . . at a minimum the hypothetical ought to include factors associated with low-stress environments, such as the ability or inability to interact with supervisors and co-workers.”

The court remanded the case.

COMMENT

When a claimant has mental impairments, his abilities (on a sustained basis) to understand, carry out, and remember simple instructions; to respond appropriately to supervision, coworkers, and usual work situations; and to deal with changes in a routine work setting must be evaluated.

 

Méndez v. Commissioner of Social Security, Civil No. 12-1725 (MEL) (D. P.R., Jan. 10, 2014)


Available at:
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6700883412783644266&q=social+security&hl=en&as_sdt=40000003&as_ylo=2014

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comment. Comments may be edited. Only general interest comments will be posted. Please do not include personally identifiable information about anyone's actual Social Security case in your comments.