The court stated: “While
a correlation between unskilled and low-stress positions may indeed exist, it
does not follow that unskilled work is necessarily low-stress. When a claimant’s
mental impairments are at issue, there is a need to examine the individual’s
specific vocational abilities in light of the impairment.”
Citing case law, the court quoted Social Security Ruling
85-15:
“The basic mental demands of
competitive, remunerative, unskilled work include the abilities (on a sustained
basis) to understand, carry out, and remember simple instructions; to respond
appropriately to supervision, coworkers, and usual work situations; and to deal
with changes in a routine work setting.”
The court found that: “The ALJ erred in making an
independent assumption that unskilled work is inherently low-stress, rather
than incorporating the factors necessary to properly evaluate the impact of a
mental impairment on claimant’s vocational abilities into his hypothetical to
the [vocational expert]. . . . at a minimum the hypothetical ought to include factors
associated with low-stress environments, such as the ability or inability to
interact with supervisors and co-workers.”
The court remanded the case.
COMMENT
When a claimant has mental impairments, his abilities (on a
sustained basis) to understand, carry out, and remember simple instructions; to
respond appropriately to supervision, coworkers, and usual work situations; and
to deal with changes in a routine work setting must be evaluated.
Méndez v. Commissioner of Social Security, Civil No. 12-1725 (MEL) (D. P.R., Jan. 10, 2014)
Available at:
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6700883412783644266&q=social+security&hl=en&as_sdt=40000003&as_ylo=2014
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. Comments may be edited. Only general interest comments will be posted. Please do not include personally identifiable information about anyone's actual Social Security case in your comments.